WertyNews
Fast mobile article powered by Nexiamath-SEO AMP.
AMP Article

Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, striking down Trump’s order

Published July 1, 2026 · Updated July 1, 2026 · By Richard Martin

Supreme Court Maintains Birthright Citizenship, Overturns Trump's Directive

Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship striking - In a pivotal ruling, the Supreme Court on Tuesday invalidated President Trump's executive order aimed at terminating birthright citizenship, reinforcing the constitutional principle that nearly all individuals born in the United States are automatically granted citizenship. The decision, rendered in the case Trump v. Barbara, marked the second major policy from Trump's second term to be overturned by the high court, following a previous ruling that dismantled his tariffs in February.

A Divided Verdict on Constitutional Interpretation

The court split 6-3, with five justices—including Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson—concluding that Trump's directive violated the 14th Amendment. Roberts emphasized in the majority opinion that the amendment was designed to ensure "citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—freely participating in our political community." He stated, "We keep that promise today."

"The Court today takes the extraordinary step of holding facially unconstitutional the President's Order excluding from citizenship the children of foreign temporary visitors and illegal aliens," wrote Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch. "This decision adds to the sad history of the Fourteenth Amendment, which was meant to secure equal rights for freed blacks but has now been repurposed for political agendas unsupported by the Reconstruction Congress."

Justice Brett Kavanaugh provided a separate rationale, asserting that the executive order breached federal law. The dissenting justices argued that the majority's historical analysis of the citizenship rule was flawed, undermining its longstanding interpretation.

Trump's Immigration Policy Target

At the core of Trump's directive was a proposal to rescind automatic citizenship for infants born to parents present in the U.S. without legal status. The policy sought to redefine the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment, which traditionally grants citizenship to "all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction."

Despite its intent, the order never took effect, as it was blocked by all federal courts that reviewed it. Trump's administration had argued the measure would apply only prospectively, yet its potential impact was significant: an estimated 250,000 children born in the U.S. could have been denied citizenship annually, according to studies from the Migration Policy Institute and Penn State's Population Research Institute.

Legislative Response and Constitutional Foundations

Reacting to the Supreme Court's decision, Trump called for congressional action to limit birthright citizenship, stating, "No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary! Congress should start TODAY to work on ending expensive and unfair to our Country, Birthright Citizenship. They will have my Complete and Total Support!"

Congress had previously codified the Citizenship Clause in 1940 via the Nationality Act and again in 1952 through the Immigration and Nationality Act. The clause was first interpreted in a landmark case in 1898, where the court confirmed birthright citizenship with rare exceptions for children of foreign diplomats, military personnel, and Native Americans. Further, in 1924, legislation granted citizenship to all Native Americans born within the U.S.